Category: Viedoklis (113 posts)

Daudzo tehnisko problēmu dēļ no ūdeņraža atsakās pat kosmiskajās raķetēs, kurām galvenais kritērijs ir degvielas enerģija uz masas vienību. Ir jāatmet mīts par "ūdeņraža ekonomiku", jo tā ir slikta zinātne, slikta ekonomika un slikta enerģētikas politika.

Because for renewables fossil resources are essential, but nuclear energy does not need either of them.

1. I don't need to generate my own low-emission electricity
2. Solar panels are not suitable for my needs
3. Solar panels produce cheap junk electricity, their payback is not guaranteed
5. I don't want to be an electricity "price watcher"
5. Solar panels are not a "green" and sustainable technology
6. Solar panels on house roofs are nothing more than peacock tails and deer antlers

•  Nacionālā apvienība VL/TB/LNNK: +1
•  Attīstībai/Par!: 0
•  Zaļo un Zemnieku savienība: 0
•  Apvienotais saraksts LZP/LRA/LP: 0
•  PROGRESĪVIE: –1
•  Jaunā vienotība: –2

For all, who care about private communication, independent of cataclysms and Big Brothers, I recommend SMS messaging apps, and, if necessary, mesh network communication.

In order for the world to achieve zero CO₂ emissions by 2050, we have to do following every day:

1. construct and network two 2GW nuclear power plants, or
2. build 1000 carbon capture and storage stations, or
3. install 3000 2MW wind turbines in the area of 3000 ha, equip them with distribution and transmission networks, and build and connect one 3GW nuclear power plant to the network, or
4. build a 40 GW solar panel station in an area of 250 km², equip it with distribution and transmission networks, and build and connect one 3GW nuclear power plant to the network, or
5. without the use of nuclear energy, install and charge 350000t of chemical batteries for one day's energy reserve.